Skip to main content

I love Apple’s minimalist Mac design, and the iPhone 17 Air needs to follow it

Apple Mac Studio 2025 top down view showing desktop.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

It’s no secret that Apple’s products are among the best designed devices in the tech industry. Just one peek at the MacBook Pro or the iPhone 16 Pro and you know that you’re looking at quality.

There’s a reason for that, and it’s got nothing to do with blind luck. No, Apple’s design philosophy has long been to strip away the unnecessary elements of a device until you’re left with only the essential components. There should be nothing extraneous, no needless fluff. Instead, the product should be the core expression of a concept, such as a phone or a computer. That has led to some of its best designs.

Recommended Videos

This was the approach taken by Apple founder Steve Jobs and the company’s former design guru Jony Ive, and it’s served Apple well over the years. By focusing on the essentials, Apple has been able to craft designs that turn heads and send its rivals racing for their photocopiers.

The latest Mac Studio epitomises this perfectly. It’s a simple, minimal slab of machined aluminium. There are no inessential aspects or flashy extras anywhere you look, just a beautiful, understated computer that looks almost inch perfect.

I love Apple’s approach here, and not just because it results in devices that are pleasing on the eye. It shows that Apple really understands that design is about more than just pretty products. Sure, the company doesn’t always get things right, but its unmatched consistency gives the impression that Apple doesn’t care about chasing trends or throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. Its understanding is more than just skin deep.

The camera bar question

Alleged render of iPhone 17 air in silver color.
@zellzoi / x

It’s interesting, then, to compare the Mac Studio to the latest iPhone 17 Air rumors, which depict a long, horizontal camera bar along the phone’s back surface. You might think that looks pretty nifty, and to some extent it does. But is it “Apple” enough? I would argue that it absolutely is not.

Let’s look at what the iPhone 17 Air is expected to get in the way of cameras. Here, most rumors are pointing to just a single lens on the back of the device. We can also expect a flash and a tiny cutout for the rear microphone. But given the phone’s extreme thinness, it’s unlikely that Apple will have the space for more camera modules.

If that’s all that’s going to be present on the back of the iPhone 17 Air, why — as multiple leaks from multiple reputable sources have attested — is Apple thinking about housing it all inside a massive camera bar that extends from one edge of the phone to the other? That’s far more space than one lens and a flash will ever require.

Alleged Render of iPhone 17 Air.
@zellzoi / x

So what is the camera bar’s purpose? Is it going to contain something that all the leakers have somehow missed? Or does it exist purely to look interesting? If it’s the latter, that’s a big departure from Apple’s established design philosophy.

To me, that’s a concern. Apple’s design isn’t just about looking good. As Steve Jobs once said, “design is how it works.” In other words, you should focus on making something work really well, and that means you remove anything that might get in the way of its optimal operation. Random visual flourishes are not key to how a product works, so they should be removed.

If this camera bar has a bunch of empty space that doesn’t seem to serve any practical purpose, it runs counter to the thinking that has crafted so many excellent Apple products over the years.

A new design direction

Apple Mac Studio with M4 Max and M3 Ultra chips and two Apple Studio Display monitors.
Apple

Yet despite all that, I’m not overly worried about this development. The Mac Studio is brand new, after all, and it still sticks to Apple’s tried-and-true design principles. Apple is full of incredibly talented designers who are among the best in the industry. They’re not going anywhere.

Yet there are a few things I’ll be watching closely. The entire iPhone 17 range is rumoured to be getting large camera bars, while iOS 19 — which will launch alongside the phones — is expected to come with a massive visual overhaul. That suggests that Apple could be looking to take its devices in a new direction.

Ultimately, it’s going to be fascinating to see what happens with the iPhone 17 range this September. There’s no way Apple will have just totally forgotten all the valuable design lessons it has learned over the years, and I don’t expect the iPhone 17 Air to be a disaster in that regard. Apple is too stacked with talent for that to happen.

But the camera bar could signal a new design development that gives me pause for thought. I love the Mac Studio’s design, and I hope Apple sticks to the principles that have served it so well over the years. In six months’ time, we’ll find out what Apple is truly thinking.

Alex Blake
Alex Blake has been working with Digital Trends since 2019, where he spends most of his time writing about Mac computers…
iPad is the best secondary screen I’ve used with a MacBook
You can extend your MacBook's screen by using an iPad as a secondary monitor.

I spend an unhealthy amount of time lurking in communities where people share aesthetic desktop setups. One of my friends recently set the group chat on fire with a triple monitor setup that had two vertical screens and an ultrawide curved panel at the center. An impulse swipe later, I achieved a similar makeover for my desk at home.

Here’s the problem, though. My $600 workstation overhaul did bring me visual joy, but not much utility. For reporting assignments, I spend the majority of the year away from home, working from deserted cafes or unnaturally uncomfortable bunk beds. I do miss the convenience of large secondary screens. Interestingly, that yearning is addressed by a rather unconventional device —the humble iPad. 

Read more
Here’s how Apple’s first foldable MacBook might win me over
The Zenbook Fold 17 open on a table.

Rumors have persisted for years now that Apple is working on a touchscreen MacBook, but I’ve never been truly convinced. For one thing, I don’t see how a touchscreen could improve my MacBook experience enough to justify the inevitable price rise. This is Apple we’re talking about, after all, and there’s just no way that a touchscreen MacBook will possibly come cheap.

As well as that, I’ve long agreed with Steve Jobs’ belief that adding a touchscreen to a regular MacBook is an ergonomic nightmare. Constantly reaching up to the display is a quick way to exhaust your arms, and paining its users isn’t really part of Apple’s playbook. The Mac operating system isn’t designed for touch either, and in any case, adding a touchscreen would result in all manner of greasy fingerprints on your monitor. It’s never seemed like a good idea to me.

Read more
I’d love to get the Mac Studio for gaming, but one thing is holding me back
Apple Mac Studio 2025 top down view showing desktop.

These days, I often feel like I’m one of those rare breeds: a gamer who also loves Macs. My home office work is split between my M1 Mac mini and my small-form-factor Windows PC, and to be honest it’s annoying to have to switch between the two all the time.

Unfortunately, my love of gaming -- and Apple’s relative inexperience here -- means that I’ve had to stick with both macOS and Windows for some time now. Sure, I’d love to drop Windows once and for all, but it just doesn’t feel as though the Mac is quite there yet in terms of gaming performance.

Read more